Review Article
Suhir E and Ghaffarian R
Abstract
A previously developed analytical thermal stress model is used for the assessment of the effect of the glasstransitiontemperature (Tg) of the underfill encapsulant and the thickness of the underfill-solder composite bond (USCB)on the induced stresses. The calculations were carried out for two Tg levels, above and below the operation and testingtemperature range for the flip-chip (FC) or the fine-pitch ball-grid-array (FPBGA) assembly with an USCB, and for twothicknesses, 0.05 mm and 0.1 mm, of the USCB. Calculations indicated that the Tg level of the underfill material had asignificant effect on the induced stresses: the normal stresses in the USCB with a low-modulus (low Tg) underfill wereabout half the stresses of the design with high-modulus (high Tg) underfill, and this was true for both thin (0.05 mmthick) and thick (0.1 mm thick) USCB layers. As to the role of the USCB thickness, thicker USCBs exhibit somewhatlower normal stresses, than thin layers, but the effect is insignificant. The maximum predicted shearing stresses occurat the USCB/chip, and not at the USCB/substrate interface. This result is in agreement with the observed, in a numberof experiments, delaminations at the USCB/chip interface, and not at the USCB/substrate interface. The obtained dataindicate also that (in a way, contrary to the current practice) there is an incentive for using low Tg underfills, provided, ofcourse, that their adhesive strength is proven to be sufficient for the lower stress level. This is an important requirement,of course, and might explain why electronic product manufacturers employ mostly high Tg underfills. As to the incentivefor using thicker USCBs, the increase in this thickness from 0.05 mm to 0.1 mm resulted in a minor relief in the normalstress in the USCB for both high and low Tg underfills, but led to an appreciable relief in the interfacial stresses at theUSCB/chip interface, especially for high Tg underfills: the predicted stress relief in this case was as significant as 34%.For low Tg underfills the stress relief was much lower, but still appreciable: about 19%. Thicker USCB layers could bemore effective, because, as has been shown in our earlier publications and confirmed experimentally, elevated stand-offheights of solder joint interconnections are able to provide appreciable stress relief in the solder material by making thebonding system more compliant. Indeed, for the thickness of 0.75 mm (impossible for FC designs, but rather typical forFPBGA systems) the decrease in the normal stress acting in the USCB cross-sections is appreciable, and the decreasein the shearing stress at the USCB/chip interface is as high as 70% in the case of high Tg underfill and even higher, 76%,in the case of low Tg underfill. The employed analytical stress model used in this analysis can be used for the selectionof the adequate underfill material and establishing the appropriate USCB thickness at the design stage. It is noteworthythat, as long as the linear approach is used and the induced stresses are proportional to the change in temperature, thedeveloped model can be used also in situations, when the underfill’s Tg is between the temperature extremes that theassembly of interest experiences during its accelerated testing and in actual operation conditions.